13 September 2011, 5:53 am
Its a bit of a confusing message, Bill Clinton being honored for his humanitarian efforts, considering his effect on women's rights. Prior to his presidency, Bill Clinton had numerous affairs throughout his marriage to Hillary, who was always aware of his infidelity. Nothing changed, when he became President; secret service agents said Clinton would have secret hotel rendezvous's with hookers, celebrities and the traditional affairs. Who knows how many there were that we don't know about. We do, however, know of dozens and dozens of women who slept with Bill, who is an honorary member of the NBA. Liberals who do not believe the propaganda that Monica was the only one, will say, "its their business" which translates to- he is a democrat so its OK. What the liberal media will never inform the public, is how the Clinton's completely reduced N.O.W. and extreme women rights advocates to become impotent and totally discredited. The Clintons called on N.O.W. to side with the predator in the Paula Jones, Monica and with the other dozens who dared to come forward. It was not easy for the women to come forward, Hillary, herself, hired thugs and bully's to jump from bushes to intimidate women not to tell the truth about the predator in the WH. If Clinton were a republican, he would have been portrayed as 10X worse than Nixon, the Clintons scandals, abuses of power and crimes were far bigger and worse than Nixon's but the media stonewalled for the Clintons. If Clinton were a republican, N.O.W. would have sided with the victims and the hundreds of other women who have been with Bill, would have surfaced, Bill Clinton making Tiger Woods look like a schoolboy among men. Sen Packwood was tarred and feathered for doing what Bill Clinton did but the media and entertainment industry want to worship his humanitarian contributions while ignoring without acknowledging the Clintons (both of them) completely reduced N.O.W. and women rights, into powerless and irrelevant action-less group. We don't hear N.O.W. screaming about women's rights in Muslim culture, it does not benefit the democratic party to stand up to women who are executed, tortured, maimed and forced to live without equal rights. The Clintons are the reason N.O.W. lost its power and credibility, as a result, the Clintons are indirectly responsible for the lack of opposition to the crimes against women, suffering in Sharia law. Is it right for the entertainment industry to worship the human rights record of Bill Clinton? http://news.yahoo.com/decade-difference-concert/ ya da whatever- you are a feminist and a supporter of Bill Clinton's philandering, interesting! I guarantee you would judge Clinton very harshly if he were not on Team Socialism. You do not really stand for women's rights when you measure your concern for women's rights, based on the effect to the democratic party. You were unable to make any debate other than name call, make speculative judgements without objectivity. I guess what you are saying is its OK for women to be harassed and abused if the predator is a socialist. Well, you have a long list of heroes who have abused women while wrapping themselves in the socialist flag- DSK, Assange, Edwards, Clinton and all the Kennedys.... Read More »
Share on del.icio.us
Share on digg
Share on Technorati
Share on reddit
Share on Yahoo!
Share on Facebook